. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Site Loader

The days of divorced parents picking up their kids every other Friday night and bringing them home to mom on Sunday nights may not be completely gone yet, but they are waning. Today’s divorced parents are changing the child custody landscape with the continuation of cohabitation, nesting, and other creative and non-traditional co-parenting arrangements.

nesting

Divorce can be difficult for children, no matter how old they are. While dealing with your parents’ separation is by far the hardest thing to handle, moving from one home to another is almost as upsetting. To combat this, some parents give children custody of the family home in an arrangement called nesting.

Instead of moving the children in and out of the house, each parent takes turns living in the family home with the children. This allows children to stay in familiar surroundings, continue to go to the same schools, stay involved in their established extracurricular activities, and remain in close contact with their friends. Mom and Dad maintain separate residences where they live temporarily while the other stays with the children, raising them in the “nest” for set periods of time.

Shared space

Maintaining two or three residences is prohibitively expensive for many divorced couples. Some divorced parents choose to continue sharing their former “marital home” with their children after the divorce. They can live together as roommates while co-parenting simultaneously, or they can set up a schedule that allows them to take turns. If the house is big enough, they can each have their own smaller secluded “space” that they take turns living in while the parent “on duty” lives in the main part of the residence, looking after the children.

neighbors

The nesting arrangement requires adequate finances to accommodate multiple residences and the shared space setup requires the ability to continue to live together in harmony. Somewhere between these two concessions lies the neighbor option.

For these ex-spouses, living apart, but in close proximity, allows them to continue raising their children every day with less interruption for the children. They may have houses on the same street or apartments in the same complex. Children can move freely between their parents’ residences, giving both mom and dad open access and eliminating many of the problems present when divorced parents live further apart.

putting children first

Obviously, these types of parenting arrangements require an extremely friendly relationship between the ex-spouses. They are clearly not for everyone. Whether parents are in a position to choose one of these recently popular modernized co-parenting systems or develop their own creative custody arrangement, what matters is that they serve the best interests of the children.

At Mejias Milgrim Alvarado, we are committed to helping our clients meet that goal by exploring their unique situations and negotiating child custody arrangements that work best for everyone. Come talk to us about your Family Law requirements.

admin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *